by mrchad9 » Thu Dec 09, 2010 5:30 pm
by SoCalHiker » Thu Dec 09, 2010 5:41 pm
mrchad9 wrote:EricChu and Marcsoltan are doing a lot of damage to their post count this week.
by EricChu » Thu Dec 09, 2010 6:31 pm
Uhmm...could you explain this please? What exactly do you mean by "post count"? And what puzzles me most of all: just why do you say Marc is damaging his post count? I can't possibly see what he has done wrong! Cheers, Ericmrchad9 wrote:EricChu and Marcsoltan are doing a lot of damage to their post count this week.
by lcarreau » Thu Dec 09, 2010 6:44 pm
by mrchad9 » Thu Dec 09, 2010 7:32 pm
EricChu wrote:Uhmm...could you explain this please? What exactly do you mean by "post count"? And what puzzles me most of all: just why do you say Marc is damaging his post count? I can't possibly see what he has done wrong! Cheers, Ericmrchad9 wrote:EricChu and Marcsoltan are doing a lot of damage to their post count this week.
by lcarreau » Thu Dec 09, 2010 7:53 pm
by visentin » Thu Dec 09, 2010 9:07 pm
SoCalHiker wrote:In general I would have to agree with you, but you yourself have over 900 posts since 2008...
by EricChu » Thu Dec 09, 2010 9:36 pm
Oh, I see...well, I'm relieved...Cheers!mrchad9 wrote:EricChu wrote:Uhmm...could you explain this please? What exactly do you mean by "post count"? And what puzzles me most of all: just why do you say Marc is damaging his post count? I can't possibly see what he has done wrong! Cheers, Ericmrchad9 wrote:EricChu and Marcsoltan are doing a lot of damage to their post count this week.
Eric- a bit of sarcasm there!
You and Marc are among those who make impressive contributions to the site, and seldom post in the forums, not often straying in here. You have 32 posts now, and he has 5. You increased your count by 10%, and him by a whopping 67% this week. It always creates a stir of excitement when longstanding members with nice pages make a rare appearance here!
(if you are not seeing when I am getting the post count from, read the fields to the left of the posts)
by EricChu » Thu Dec 09, 2010 9:38 pm
You're right Larry - snow angels are a quite more worthwhile thing than numbers racing hehehe!lcarreau wrote:Sorry, but I have one burning question. WHY are you folks taking "Postcounts" so seriously ???
Does anybody on this site give a RATASS about the numbers game? For crying out loud... just sayin'.
I'm going outside to make a snow angel. Geez.. I forgot; you need SNOW to make snow angels!
by Husker » Fri Dec 10, 2010 1:02 am
lcarreau wrote:EricChu wrote: According to his profile, it's Sihler, not Shiler...or am I suffering of bad eye sight?
Cheers,
Eric
I can't speak for the OP, but I believe the "misspelling" was intentional.
HEY Eric #2 ??? HOW is your eyesight NOW ???
by mrchad9 » Fri Dec 10, 2010 1:22 am
Husker wrote:lcarreau wrote:EricChu wrote: According to his profile, it's Sihler, not Shiler...or am I suffering of bad eye sight?
Cheers,
Eric
I can't speak for the OP, but I believe the "misspelling" was intentional.
HEY Eric #2 ??? HOW is your eyesight NOW ???
The one on the left is fat! I'll take the one in the middle.
by visentin » Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:51 am
lcarreau wrote:HEY Eric #2 ??? HOW is your eyesight NOW ???
by Marmaduke » Fri Dec 10, 2010 7:29 am
by Charles » Fri Dec 10, 2010 9:35 am
truchas wrote:The one on the left is fugly. I'll take the one in the middle.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests