San Juan Range > Contiguous US 14ers > CommentsContiguous US 14ers Comments
[ Post a Comment ]
|
| RyanS | to make the blank cells look nicer | |
Voted 10/10 | include this code in the cell: & | |
| Posted Aug 25, 2006 6:22 pm | ||
 | ||
| Brian Kalet | Re: to make the blank cells look nicer | |
Hasn't voted | Thanks! | |
| Posted Aug 26, 2006 7:23 pm | ||
| thebeave7 | Good Addition | |
Hasn't voted | I really like this addition, adds something for the # chasers. One question, what exactly is meant by "Parent"? | |
| Posted Aug 28, 2006 10:33 pm | ||
| ||
| Brian Kalet | Re: Good Addition | |
Hasn't voted | Also reffered to as the nearest topographic highest peak, is the closest peak higher than the peak of interest along a connecting ridge. The col between the two peaks is the key col and used to determine the prominence of the peak. Should I add the following link to the table or define the terms in my page?Parent | |
| Posted Aug 28, 2006 11:50 pm | ||
| ||
| thebeave7 | Re: Good Addition | |
Hasn't voted | It might be nice for some of us who don't know all these terms. | |
| Posted Aug 29, 2006 3:01 am | ||
| ||
| Brian Kalet | Re: Good Addition | |
Hasn't voted | I've added a link from the table. | |
| Posted Aug 29, 2006 5:25 pm | ||
| Brad Snider | Great List! | |
Voted 10/10 | Thanks for adding this to SP, along with your CA 14ers list. Accurate and consistent with what is actually ranked and what is simply named (using the 300 foot rule). Good reference for future climbs. By the way, I enjoyed the Little Bear trip w/ you--sorry I couldn't join you on Ellingwood/Blanca. -Brad | |
| Posted Sep 4, 2006 3:57 pm | ||
| ||
| Brian Kalet | Re: Great List! | |
Hasn't voted | Thanks! The Little Bear trip was definitely an experience. Hope all is well in VA. | |
| Posted Sep 5, 2006 3:53 pm | ||
| Haliku | Why | |
Hasn't voted | have the parent/miles from parent column? Seems to me to make your table more confusing. Otherwise great page! Cheers! | |
| Posted Sep 21, 2007 10:34 am | ||
| ||
| Brian Kalet | Re: Why | |
Hasn't voted | The saddle between the peak and parent determines the prominence, which dictates whether a peak is ranked. The miles from parent is also referred to as isolation. This is a parameter that is of interest to many peak baggers. | |
| Posted Sep 21, 2007 11:37 am | ||
| desainme | The Beaver | |
Voted 10/10 | whose parent is Longs, appears to be 14, 056 feet over the notch of 13,920 giving it a prominence of 136 feet should be included I think. Figures are from Google Earth. | |
| Posted Sep 21, 2007 1:10 pm | ||
| ||
| Brian Kalet | Re: The Beaver | |
Hasn't voted | I've added it. It appears that the most widely accepted name is "Southeast Longs" and the route that travels over it is called The Beaver. Thanks. | |
| Posted Sep 21, 2007 2:29 pm | ||
| Klenke | Mt. Rainier not attached | |
Hasn't voted | Mt. Rainier appears to not be attached to this page for some reason. | |
| Posted Mar 24, 2008 8:51 pm | ||
| ||
| Brian Kalet | Re: Mt. Rainier not attached | |
Hasn't voted | It is now. Thanks. | |
| Posted Mar 25, 2008 2:02 am | ||
| Jeremy Hakes | Great page. | |
Voted 10/10 | Good job, Brian. This is a great page! | |
| Posted Jan 28, 2009 5:44 pm | ||
|