by anita » Fri Sep 13, 2013 5:17 pm
by mrchad9 » Fri Sep 13, 2013 5:51 pm
<img src="PHOTO URL HERE">
<img src="PHOTO URL HERE" height="42" width="42">
by Scott » Fri Sep 13, 2013 6:46 pm
by anita » Fri Sep 13, 2013 7:02 pm
by mrchad9 » Fri Sep 13, 2013 7:10 pm
by anita » Fri Sep 13, 2013 7:19 pm
This license lets others distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work, even commercially, as long as they credit you for the original creation. This is the most accommodating of licenses offered. Recommended for maximum dissemination and use of licensed materials.
This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit you and license their new creations under the identical terms. This license is often compared to “copyleft” free and open source software licenses. All new works based on yours will carry the same license, so any derivatives will also allow commercial use. This is the license used by Wikipedia, and is recommended for materials that would benefit from incorporating content from Wikipedia and similarly licensed projects.
by brichardsson » Fri Sep 13, 2013 7:25 pm
- am I understanding this: if the picture I want to use has the above license, I can in fact upload and place it on the page as long as I credit the owner ?
by brichardsson » Fri Sep 13, 2013 7:27 pm
by mrchad9 » Fri Sep 13, 2013 7:32 pm
brichardsson wrote:also, as long as they are letting you use the image, you should save it and upload it to a file sharing site yourself, and then link to that (still giving them credit, of course). that way, if they take it down or reorganize their site at some point, you won't wind up with a broken link on your page.
by brichardsson » Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:00 pm
Well yeah... but that file sharing site could be just uploading it to SP directly.
by Bob Sihler » Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:01 pm
anita wrote:mrchad9 wrote:Maybe you will get POTD.
omg really? you think so?
that would be pretty darn nifty!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests