by Gangolf Haub » Tue Oct 19, 2010 3:37 pm
by Michael Hoyt » Tue Oct 19, 2010 5:51 pm
by MoapaPk » Tue Oct 19, 2010 6:35 pm
by MoapaPk » Tue Oct 19, 2010 10:50 pm
by visentin » Wed Oct 20, 2010 8:55 am
by WouterB » Wed Oct 20, 2010 5:10 pm
by visentin » Thu Oct 21, 2010 7:54 am
Montana Matt wrote:I suppose it could be done, but if there are multiple mapping applets that need to be used for different places all over the world, programming that could be tedious and time consuming.
Montana Matt wrote:In my opinion, Google Maps isn't all that bad. It definitely gives you a very good idea of the terrain and what you might be up against.
If there were a single applet that had topomaps for the entire world, I'd be all for adding that applet to SummitPost, but it doesn't sound like that's the case, right?
by visentin » Thu Oct 21, 2010 8:05 am
by peterbud » Fri Oct 22, 2010 1:19 pm
visentin wrote:- Perhaps GPX routes should simply be a new type of object, that, just like images, we attach to other kind of objects (the advantage would be to use it both for a route, a TR like Gangolf mentionned, or even a peak ?) A question in this case, would several GPXes be attached to one object ? (maybe the page reader would enjoy having the choice between several traces of various quality ?)
Eric
by visentin » Fri Oct 22, 2010 1:32 pm
peterbud wrote:visentin wrote:- Perhaps GPX routes should simply be a new type of object, that, just like images, we attach to other kind of objects (the advantage would be to use it both for a route, a TR like Gangolf mentionned, or even a peak ?) A question in this case, would several GPXes be attached to one object ? (maybe the page reader would enjoy having the choice between several traces of various quality ?)
Eric
Worth to think about.
by peterbud » Fri Oct 22, 2010 2:33 pm
visentin wrote:I'm not sure if several GPX make sense, unless we allow displaying them all at once
by Gangolf Haub » Fri Oct 22, 2010 2:55 pm
by MoapaPk » Fri Oct 22, 2010 4:20 pm
Gangolf Haub wrote:Matt, one more suggestion:
the route profile has the statistics placed in one line above the elevation profile. I think it would be better arranged as a list (beside or below the graph). I have occasionally uploaded screenshots from a German site which look like this:
by Lolli » Tue Nov 16, 2010 8:49 pm
by MoapaPk » Tue Nov 16, 2010 9:33 pm
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest