Northern California Hiking Community

Regional discussion and conditions reports for the Golden State. Please post partners requests and trip plans in the California Climbing Partners forum.
User Avatar
mrchad9

 
Posts: 4545
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 12:01 am
Thanked: 1338 times in 911 posts

Re: Northern California Hiking Community

by mrchad9 » Wed Sep 29, 2010 2:27 am

Well, champ, it is not a secret. It is listed in dozens of registers all over the Sierra, on the SC website (along with at least a half dozen other ladies full names, and many of their home towns, phone numbers, email addresses, and in some cases street addresses). And not sure why you didn't erase the other seven or so folks last names from the photo if you really thought it was an issue.

Information is out there, a photo of a register doesn't change that. There are also 100s of women on this website that use their full names in their IDs, and none have ever been stalked. But perhaps I wouldn't characterize it as being overly cautious, rather providing a completely false sense of caution. It is absolutely a non issue.

And... I don't think that thread was even "controversial". Not in a way that would provoke the kind of activity you are suggesting.

User Avatar
Day Hiker

 
Posts: 3156
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2003 2:57 am
Thanked: 61 times in 43 posts

Re: Northern California Hiking Community

by Day Hiker » Wed Sep 29, 2010 4:33 am

mrchad9 wrote:Well, champ, it is not a secret. It is listed in dozens of registers all over the Sierra, on the SC website (along with at least a half dozen other ladies full names, and many of their home towns, phone numbers, email addresses, and in some cases street addresses). And not sure why you didn't erase the other seven or so folks last names from the photo if you really thought it was an issue.

Information is out there, a photo of a register doesn't change that. There are also 100s of women on this website that use their full names in their IDs, and none have ever been stalked. But perhaps I wouldn't characterize it as being overly cautious, rather providing a completely false sense of caution. It is absolutely a non issue.

And... I don't think that thread was even "controversial". Not in a way that would provoke the kind of activity you are suggesting.


You asked and I answered. That's all. It was never really that big of a deal.

Previous

Return to California

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron