We are not to blame.
Aliens do exist
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EoDZQApq ... r2-2r-8-HM
by Ejnar Fjerdingstad » Wed Dec 16, 2009 10:48 pm
erykmynn wrote:Maybe they figure they'll be off-shore after sea level rise? Those aren't the people I was talking about anyways. IMO saying you're an environmentalist doesn't make you an environmentalist. If you're doing a bad job of being an environmentalist, then you're not an environmentalist.Ejnar Fjerdingstad wrote:erykmynn wrote:I hate to break it to you, but those people aren't environmentalists.patssox09 wrote:erykmynn wrote:whoa now buddy. lets not put environmentalists and AGW all in the same boat. sure, most AGW proponents are environmentalists. but there are AGW proponents that only give a shit about AGW, and there are enviros who are sick of the AGW-BS fest taking center stage.patssox09 wrote:erykmynn wrote:100 Reasons Not to Talk About Global Warming, Ever
No one would be talking about it if the environmentalists weren't trying to shove these down our throats.
you'll find quite a few of the latter right here on summitpost. do you hate the environment? if so what are you doing on an outdoors website?
now....
who taught the enviros that they have to shove shit down peoples throat to get things done? makes you wonder.
I actually am an environmentalist, a paleo-environmentalist. I'm all for conservation, more wilderness areas, protected areas, etc. Your typical environmentalist today will happily fill Yosemite Valley with concrete or chop down all the Redwoods if it that resulted in Cap and Trade and Hybrids for all.
Oh yes, they are. In Denmark the nature conservancy association used to throw a fit if the state wanted to build a single high-voltage line. Now they are in favour of putting hundreds of windmills in preserved wetlands!
A lot of environmentalists are realizing that AGW is de-personalizing, and taking emphasis away from more tangible issues. I know you like Nuclear, and the enviros did play a big role in the changed perception of that power source. But without 3 mile island and chernobyl, would they have had nearly as much shit in their diapers?
by Snidely Whiplash » Wed Dec 16, 2009 11:02 pm
by Snidely Whiplash » Thu Dec 17, 2009 2:42 am
peladoboton wrote:so is the lava coming closer to the surface?
what, in the opinion of any with any knowledge on these matters, is the cause of the warming?
(me and my tundra are interested....)
by dakotaconcrete » Thu Dec 17, 2009 3:00 am
etsnyd wrote:peladoboton wrote:so is the lava coming closer to the surface?
what, in the opinion of any with any knowledge on these matters, is the cause of the warming?
(me and my tundra are interested....)
We are coming out of the Little Ice Age that lasted from roughly 1300-1850. It has been warming for over 300 years, with the bottom of the Little Ice Age occurring in the late 1600's. It is indeed warming, but not nearly as quickly as the doomsayers say we are. The rate of warming is not dangerous nor is it unprecedented, and was matched during the beginning of the 20th century. Sea level is not rising any faster this century than last century. It is a natural cycle, perhaps caused by solar activity, perhaps by ocean salinity/currrents, and nobody knows why, including these idiots who say the science is settled.
by Snidely Whiplash » Thu Dec 17, 2009 3:32 am
dakotaconcrete wrote:etsnyd wrote:peladoboton wrote:so is the lava coming closer to the surface?
what, in the opinion of any with any knowledge on these matters, is the cause of the warming?
(me and my tundra are interested....)
We are coming out of the Little Ice Age that lasted from roughly 1300-1850. It has been warming for over 300 years, with the bottom of the Little Ice Age occurring in the late 1600's. It is indeed warming, but not nearly as quickly as the doomsayers say we are. The rate of warming is not dangerous nor is it unprecedented, and was matched during the beginning of the 20th century. Sea level is not rising any faster this century than last century. It is a natural cycle, perhaps caused by solar activity, perhaps by ocean salinity/currrents, and nobody knows why, including these idiots who say the science is settled.
Proof?
by The Chief » Thu Dec 17, 2009 3:35 am
dakotaconcrete wrote:Proof?
by Snidely Whiplash » Thu Dec 17, 2009 3:38 pm
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests