Upgrading from an Osprey Aether 70

Post climbing gear-related questions, offer advice. For classifieds, please use that forum.
User Avatar
radson

 
Posts: 1968
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 11:34 pm
Thanked: 122 times in 86 posts

Re: Upgrading from an Osprey Aether 70

by radson » Mon Mar 08, 2010 8:19 pm

NG wrote:I did Rainier last year, and going at it again at the end of May this year, last time, I used my Osprey Aether 70, which was great and comfortable, however, this time around, I am trying to lighten my load a little, by selling some stuff on Ebay and upgrading to lighter stuff...I am thinking of getting a lighter pack, and going with the Cilo Gear 60 Worksac, any thoughts or other suggested packs I can look at that would be lighter then the Osprey Thanks


I have the cilogear but it has yet to fire a shot in anger. My wife has a new BD Quantum which is also bloody light.

From memory the Aether is pretty light to begin with. For climbing Rainier, you may be best served saving your money.

otherwise hmm, I think the new MH packs are fairly light and can be stripped down to basically nothing.

User Avatar
ScottyP

 
Posts: 633
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:43 pm
Thanked: 36 times in 28 posts

by ScottyP » Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:35 pm

I agree, keep the Aether 70. I too have the pack and used it on the Kautz last year. I am buying the Aether 85 as my Denali pack next week. Solid packs at a reasonable weight IMHO. I converted from a Gregory that was a tad over 7#s! (Lassen) Scott

no avatar
sneakyracer

 
Posts: 238
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:52 am
Thanked: 13 times in 11 posts

by sneakyracer » Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:03 am

I dont think going from a 70l down to a 60L packs will make much difference.

I have a Osprey Mutant 38 (Large), its lightweight and simple but tough and has nice features. Its about 45L easy but its narrow which is great for climbing. The suspension works great even though its not fully rigid. I have loaded it completely and its very comfortable all day. Its basically an alpine climbing pack but its very versatile. I use it for a lot of activities.

The pack is light. If you want to go lighter then you need to go to packs that are basically frameless.

User Avatar
Hotoven

 
Posts: 1864
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 8:06 pm
Thanked: 118 times in 89 posts

by Hotoven » Tue Mar 09, 2010 3:55 pm

squishy wrote:No one ever talks about Gossamer Gear, I wonder why? I bet they are not very durable...

Sub 2lb packs...some down to 16oz's at 66L...

http://www.gossamergear.com/cgi-bin/gos ... index.html


Dang, those things look goofy! I'm guessing they sacrifice durability with their lightness.

User Avatar
Brad F

 
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 7:43 pm
Thanked: 4 times in 4 posts

by Brad F » Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:15 pm

MEC has the Alpinelite 60, which weighs the same as the Cilogear WorkSack. It's quite a bit cheaper too.

http://www.mec.ca/Products/product_detail.jsp?PRODUCT%3C%3Eprd_id=845524442617749&FOLDER%3C%3Efolder_id=2534374302699867&bmUID=1268150599387


Return to Gear

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests