This page needs to be put out of its misery:
http://www.summitpost.org/area/range/66 ... orest.html
by nartreb » Tue Oct 12, 2010 1:17 am
by mrchad9 » Tue Oct 12, 2010 1:57 am
nartreb wrote:This page needs to be put out of its misery:
http://www.summitpost.org/area/range/66 ... orest.html
by Castlereagh » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:16 am
mrchad9 wrote:nartreb wrote:This page needs to be put out of its misery:
http://www.summitpost.org/area/range/66 ... orest.html
Maybe we should have a poll. The members can pick which of the two White Mountain NF areas are better.
by yatsek » Fri Oct 15, 2010 11:02 am
by chugach mtn boy » Fri Oct 15, 2010 4:24 pm
by yatsek » Fri Oct 15, 2010 5:25 pm
chugach mtn boy wrote:Well, Yatsek, the current owner is Slovak and the peak is in Slovakia. Normally, a little diplomacy might be needed for a Big Bad Pole to wade in and kick the Slovak off his own mountains. But fortunately, the Slovak is not selfish and has posted this on his profile:
"Some of my pages need completion and additions, some albums need then to be converted to mountain pages. If you want to do this, email me and I will grant you editor rights."
Looks like you're in luck!
by chugach mtn boy » Fri Oct 15, 2010 7:05 pm
yatsek wrote: ... but I'm not gonna delete myself if this doesn't happen.
Cheers,
Jacek
by yatsek » Fri Oct 15, 2010 9:33 pm
by chugach mtn boy » Fri Oct 15, 2010 10:33 pm
yatsek wrote: ... first check out this page of mine, which Bob the Great SPinquisitor will delete as soon as he becomes aware of its existence.
by yatsek » Mon Oct 18, 2010 1:08 pm
chugach mtn boy wrote:Well, Yatsek, the current owner is Slovak and the peak is in Slovakia. Normally, a little diplomacy might be needed for a Big Bad Pole to wade in and kick the Slovak off his own mountains. But fortunately, the Slovak is not selfish and has posted this on his profile:
"Some of my pages need completion and additions, some albums need then to be converted to mountain pages. If you want to do this, email me and I will grant you editor rights."
Looks like you're in luck!
by TyeDyeTwins » Mon Oct 18, 2010 7:36 pm
by mrchad9 » Mon Oct 18, 2010 7:59 pm
TyeDyeTwins wrote:I am somewhat new to the rules of SP and was curious what the proccedure is for a page that an SP member considers bad. For example in the Central Wasatch Range a very popular Sp member took 3 mountains along the Millcreek Ridgeline (Mount Aire, Church Fork Peak, and Millvue), and put them on a single page. Normally that would be fine but each mountain on the page had only about 2-4 sentences about each mountain. I will admit that I have not contacted the page owner....the last thing I want to do is create contravosy on this site. If I were to want to create a mountain page off of 1 of the 3 of the mountains already grouped together.....how would I (if possible) go about that? Many thanks for your time.
by nader » Thu Oct 21, 2010 1:57 pm
by Bob Sihler » Thu Oct 21, 2010 2:20 pm
by surgent » Thu Oct 21, 2010 3:10 pm
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests