bad climbing partners

Post general questions and discuss issues related to climbing.
no avatar
unfiguroutable

 
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 7:23 am
Thanked: 0 time in 0 post

Re: bad climbing partners

by unfiguroutable » Mon Jul 16, 2012 8:54 am

when i rope up with a newbie it is on a climb that i am 100% i am not going to fall and or with a trusted third to watch the unknown climber. You have only your self to blame.

User Avatar
GEM Trail

 
Posts: 250
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 3:48 pm
Thanked: 27 times in 16 posts

Re: bad climbing partners

by GEM Trail » Mon Jul 16, 2012 4:51 pm

Great thread. I guess I have been lucky to only climb with people I already knew, which eliminates many of these surprises.

You wonder what constitutes a bad partner. The first kind is an unsafe partner. You cannot fuck around with these people. I have to admit that when I was young most of you would have considered me an idiot, doing things way over my head with little to no experience. Fortunately, most of my buddies were same way! In later years I have had to school some people, but luckily they have always listened to me. At least so far!

The second kind of bad partner is someone who, for whatever reason, you don't get along with. Depending on the nature of your differences, things can be worked out as you begin to accomodate each other. To take this to an extreme, how many girls have you taken climbing, or even camping? Almost all of them require significant changes to your trip that, if you weren't getting laid, would probably be dealbreakers. But you compromise and carry the heavy shit and wake her up with a fresh brewed espresso and suddenly she's more adventurous.

With guy partners I take the same attitude- we are in this together, whatever it takes to make a good trip I am willing to do. Short of the getting laid part!

User Avatar
Sarah Simon

 
Posts: 937
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 12:01 am
Thanked: 240 times in 108 posts

Re: bad climbing partners

by Sarah Simon » Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:02 pm

GEM Trail wrote:To take this to an extreme, how many girls have you taken climbing, or even camping? Almost all of them require significant changes to your trip that, if you weren't getting laid, would probably be dealbreakers. But you compromise and carry the heavy shit and wake her up with a fresh brewed espresso and suddenly she's more adventurous.


Wow, all this time, I never knew a) I was putting a serious crimp in the climbing plans of my guy climbing partners, completely ruining their weekends, esp. because there was no sex involved and b) that they were supposed to carry my gear and brew espresso for me. :o

Thanks for the enlightenment!
Go climb a mountain

The following user would like to thank Sarah Simon for this post
Daria

User Avatar
Woodie Hopper

 
Posts: 456
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 6:06 pm
Thanked: 28 times in 24 posts

Re: bad climbing partners

by Woodie Hopper » Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:45 pm

GEM Trail wrote:To take this to an extreme, how many girls have you taken climbing, or even camping? Almost all of them require significant changes to your trip that, if you weren't getting laid, would probably be dealbreakers. But you compromise and carry the heavy shit and wake her up with a fresh brewed espresso and suddenly she's more adventurous.

With guy partners I take the same attitude- we are in this together, whatever it takes to make a good trip I am willing to do. Short of the getting laid part!


Really?

Unless this was just a poor attempt at being funny, all I can say is "Yuck!".

User Avatar
Marmaduke

 
Posts: 1541
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:08 am
Thanked: 730 times in 563 posts

Re: bad climbing partners

by Marmaduke » Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:53 pm

GEM, speaking of getting laid, you just laid an egg with your post.

User Avatar
TimB

 
Posts: 271
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 11:15 pm
Thanked: 43 times in 33 posts

Re: bad climbing partners

by TimB » Mon Jul 16, 2012 6:48 pm

Marmaduke wrote:GEM, speaking of getting laid, you just laid an egg with your post.

:D

I wouldn't mind finding some women climbing partners, but I ain't hauling an espresso maker up the mountain, no sir!
:mrgreen:

User Avatar
Vitaliy M.

 
Posts: 1015
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 1:23 am
Thanked: 288 times in 216 posts

Re: bad climbing partners

by Vitaliy M. » Mon Jul 16, 2012 8:00 pm

GEM Trail wrote:With guy partners I take the same attitude- we are in this together, whatever it takes to make a good trip I am willing to do. Short of the getting laid part!



what if they hauled a coffee maker for you? :lol:

User Avatar
Daria

 
Posts: 434
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 12:33 am
Thanked: 273 times in 191 posts

Re: bad climbing partners

by Daria » Mon Jul 16, 2012 8:47 pm

Woodie Hopper wrote:
GEM Trail wrote:To take this to an extreme, how many girls have you taken climbing, or even camping? Almost all of them require significant changes to your trip that, if you weren't getting laid, would probably be dealbreakers. But you compromise and carry the heavy shit and wake her up with a fresh brewed espresso and suddenly she's more adventurous.

With guy partners I take the same attitude- we are in this together, whatever it takes to make a good trip I am willing to do. Short of the getting laid part!


Really?

Unless this was just a poor attempt at being funny, all I can say is "Yuck!".



"yuck!"-my sentiments exactly.
I'm the top troll.

User Avatar
SierraSeeker

 
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 9:05 pm
Thanked: 2 times in 2 posts

Re: bad climbing partners

by SierraSeeker » Mon Jul 16, 2012 9:30 pm

My first post, and relevant to a recent experience...

Was the beneficiary of a lucky trail meetup and subsequent climbing partnership (for a day) on Mount Abbott at the end of June.

Had planned to solo the NE Couloir route and shared some trail beta with a solo climber during an acclimatization hike, she had planned on tackling Mt. Starr the next day.

Long story short, we teamed up for Mount Abbott, everything clicked, we had a blast on a great day, in a great location and will always remember how a chance meeting can turn into a great adventure.

Part of our initial discussion for this climb included the, "we must respect each other's level of comfort and safety and if something doesn't feel right, we need to talk about it, ego-free."

When we hit the top of the ridge late that afternoon and got blasted by the wind (50+ mph) on the knife-edge, that earlier conversation made turning back a whole lot easier.

As a result of our turning back, the glissade down the couloir was PERFECTLY timed; in a couple of more hours, it might have been quite icy.

Pics and trip report to follow.

Full disclaimer: we both related to each other later, how, when we first met, there was an instant of "I feel like I've known this person for years" and our conversation of teaming up was a result of this mutual feeling. If my gut had said no, I wouldn't have even mentioned my plans.

Summary: if your instincts say no, it's probably wise to listen. The opposite can also be true, so go with an open mind.

MK

The following user would like to thank SierraSeeker for this post
TimB

User Avatar
Princess Buttercup

 
Posts: 541
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 7:13 pm
Thanked: 456 times in 245 posts

Re: bad climbing partners

by Princess Buttercup » Tue Jul 17, 2012 3:10 am

GEM Trail wrote:
To take this to an extreme, how many girls have you taken climbing, or even camping? Almost all of them require significant changes to your trip that, if you weren't getting laid, would probably be dealbreakers. But you compromise and carry the heavy shit and wake her up with a fresh brewed espresso and suddenly she's more adventurous.



Are you one of those guys who will carry all of the heavy shit? Because I'd like to sign up for that trip.

Jesus, what a pussy.

User Avatar
Ben Beckerich

 
Posts: 385
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2011 3:24 am
Thanked: 67 times in 52 posts

Re: bad climbing partners

by Ben Beckerich » Tue Jul 17, 2012 3:33 am

Wow... don't take a crack at the weaker sex 'round hur, eh?
where am i going... and why am i in this handbasket?

User Avatar
kylenicolls

 
Posts: 151
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 6:15 am
Thanked: 8 times in 6 posts

Re: bad climbing partners

by kylenicolls » Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:34 am

Daria wrote:
Woodie Hopper wrote:"yuck!"-my sentiments exactly.


Yuck...black light? Lol

But seriously, I think some of you are taking GEM Trail a bit too literally. It's an "extreme" comparison (said it in the post too) about compromise.

This reminds me of this random friend of a friend getting bent about me using the word 'chick' last month and proceeded with subtle personal insults. Apparently it is objectifying and offensive. Chill out, Christ...

User Avatar
Marmaduke

 
Posts: 1541
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:08 am
Thanked: 730 times in 563 posts

Re: bad climbing partners

by Marmaduke » Tue Jul 17, 2012 8:02 am

Don't know who you are (I'm sure a current SPer with another account) and I don't know Daria but taking cheap shots at her for a personal thing you have in an open forum shows your level of class. Just my opinion, we all had seen a lot of this some time back, was nice had ended.

User Avatar
Marmaduke

 
Posts: 1541
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:08 am
Thanked: 730 times in 563 posts

Re: bad climbing partners

by Marmaduke » Tue Jul 17, 2012 9:01 am

The Elves will take care of that Daria, he using an another avatar, expose him.

User Avatar
Bob Burd
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 4271
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2001 10:42 pm
Thanked: 572 times in 296 posts

Re: bad climbing partners

by Bob Burd » Tue Jul 17, 2012 6:27 pm

Oddly, it was all pretty much on subject. Sacramento does strange things to people.

The following user would like to thank Bob Burd for this post
Princess Buttercup

PreviousNext

Return to General

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests