by Bob Burd » Sun Aug 30, 2015 6:32 am
by Gangolf Haub » Sun Aug 30, 2015 9:57 am
by MoapaPk » Sun Aug 30, 2015 1:09 pm
by Jesus Malverde » Sun Aug 30, 2015 5:07 pm
by David Senesac » Mon Aug 31, 2015 4:59 am
by nartreb » Mon Aug 31, 2015 2:19 pm
by Bob Burd » Mon Aug 31, 2015 6:54 pm
Jesus Malverde wrote:Bob,
You raise an interesting question. FWIW, I use Contact brand covering (clear version) to cover both ink and laser jet printing of maps. Covering one side will suffice, but if you are on a particularly long, wet or abrasive trip/climb, covering both sides (map face and back) will greatly ensure a map that is almost waterproof and and pretty much tear proof. Plus the map can be reused/re-gifted many times.
http://www.amazon.com/Con-Tact-Covering ... B00D8GBO2G
The contact covering processes takes only a couple of minutes at most and can be done the night before the trip.
by DukeJH » Mon Aug 31, 2015 7:50 pm
by nartreb » Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:08 pm
in time I suspect that the digital details of maps will far exceed their printed counterpart.
by boyblue » Tue Sep 01, 2015 5:42 am
by logsden » Tue Sep 01, 2015 7:03 am
by LincolnB » Tue Sep 01, 2015 7:49 pm
by MoapaPk » Tue Sep 01, 2015 11:32 pm
by Sierra Ledge Rat » Sun Sep 06, 2015 7:49 pm
Bob Burd wrote:Do others have strong feelings about this one way or another?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest