Nikman wrote:I bought myself a treadmill (Horizon Fitness Paragon III HRC) recently and kind of like it. It can be adjusted up to 12 percent acclivity. If I adjust it at 12 percent, I can go for 99 mins at 5km per hour with a constant heart rate about 150 bps.
This results in 8,25km total distance or an altitude of 990 meters workout.
After working out on the treadmill, I feel pretty well compared to my exhaustion after running 10km outside (what I usualy do in something under an hour with 350 meters of total altitude). No more pain in the knee from the treadmill, that I have once in a while when running on solid ground/streets outside.
Does this kind of training (kind of low speed combined with constant altitude) improve the physical endurance better compared to a higher speed without any or constant altitude?
It depends if you are looking to improve anaerobic threshold or general endurance. _ But in general if the 10K outdoors is harder then the 8.25Km/990m altitude gain then you will probably not gain as much improvement on the treadmill (really depends on wat you mean as beat up. If you are describing it as less fatigue due to work load then you ave your answer. At higher workloads (near anaerobic thresholds) several things are going on, many of them beneficial.
BUT if you find that you have less pain while doing that workout as compared to running outside, you are better off doing it. If you can prevent injury and continually workout at a level, that is better then working out harder and dealing with injuries.